Difference between a blast in London and a Blast in Kashmir

Today morning when I opened the News channel, I heard that there were few more bomb blast in London. Casualties were not reported. Probably these were the minor blast. But the panic among the citizens is strong. I was just comparing the blast in London with a blast in Kashmir (or any where in India). There is fundamental difference in both. A blast in Kashmir or (any other part of India) is named as "Fight for Freedom" but a blast in London will be named as "Terrorist Attack". And CNN and BBC will have a program running continuously to give you the update about that. Why not same happens when there is attack in India or any other so called "Developing Countries"? Please give your comments about this difference, however it looks similar to me like "Kallu's son dies with maleria , and no body have to time to talk about that but there will be 200 press reporters outside Michale Jackson's residence just know how many time he sneazed as he is having cold. So in the next news program you will have a headline like this .. "Michale sneazed 5 times continuosly...for more update stay tuned to XXX chanel".

Any news on Kallu's son? Who the hell is Kallu?

But no matter where blast is, people die, which is a greatest insult to almighty. No one have right to destroy his creations like this. May be one day, world will understand the similarties and forget the difference in the blasts, and then they will unite and fight with enemies to Almighty's creations.

-Narender